SHORT CHRISTIAN READINGS SELECTED FOR FORMER JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES



Jehovah's Witnesses and Shunning
Author Unknown
(edited)

One of the characteristics of a destructive religion is an enforced policy that requires the members to shun anyone who leaves or gets expelled from the religion. It is a common trait among esoteric movements that claim to be "the Truth." Members are required to sever association with even their own family members and relatives who leave. The consequences of this harsh doctrinal policy are extreme, shattering family relationships and leaving the victims emotionally and spiritually devastated. Suicides or attempted suicides are not uncommon.

Jehovah's Witnesses are among the religious groups that practice extreme shunning of former members. Of all the Watchtower Society's legalistic doctrines, this one is perhaps the most responsible for uprising among former members against the Organization that has resulted in exhaustive examination and expose of their flawed teachings and history.

Former members who disavow faith in the Watchtower organization's doctrines are branded "apostates." Jehovah's Witnesses are taught that they must hate such ones. An article titled "Search Through Me, O God" appeared in the October 1, 1993 Watchtower. Speaking about "apostates" on page 19, beginning with paragraph 15, we read:

15 Regarding them, the psalmist said: "Do I not hate those who are intensely hating you, O Jehovah, and do I not feel a loathing for those revolting against you? With a complete hatred I do hate them. They have become to me real enemies." (Psalm 139:21, 22) It was because they intensely hated Jehovah that David looked on them with abhorrence. Apostates are included among those who show their hatred of Jehovah by revolting against him. Apostasy is, in reality, a rebellion against Jehovah. Some apostates profess to know and serve God, but they reject teachings or requirements set out in his Word. Others claim to believe the Bible, but they reject Jehovah's organization and actively try to hinder its work. When they deliberately choose such badness after knowing what is right, when the bad becomes so ingrained that it is an inseparable part of their makeup, then a Christian must hate (in the Biblical sense of the word) those who have inseparably attached themselves to the badness. True Christians share Jehovah's feelings toward such apostates; they are not curious about apostate ideas. On the contrary, they "feel a loathing" toward those who have made themselves God's enemies, but they leave it to Jehovah to execute vengeance.--Job 13:16; Romans 12:19; 2 John 9, 10.

An article in The Watchtower, September 15, 1981, on page 29 under the heading DISFELLOWSHIPED RELATIVES NOT LIVING AT HOME has this to say (beginning at paragraph 18):

18 The second situation that we need to consider is that involving a disfellowshiped or disassociated relative who is not in the immediate family circle or living at one's home. Such a person is still related by blood or marriage, and so there may be some limited need to care for necessary family matters. Nonetheless, it is not as if he were living in the same home where contact and conversation could not be avoided. We should keep clearly in mind the Bible's inspired direction: "Quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person ... not even eating with such a man."--1 Cor.5:11.

See also the reference to this article on page 20 of The Watchtower, November 15, 1988.

Disfellowshipping versus SHUNNING

The point of this commentary will be to show that the Watchtower Society's shunning doctrine does not adhere to the Bible. Further, an understanding of congregational practices of first-century Christians in the Jewish culture is necessary for a proper understanding of the scriptures on this matter.

The primary scripture for consideration is:

But now I am writing you to quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, not even eating with such a man. -- 1.Cor. 5:11 (NWT)

The text is clear that a person with whom the congregation should not mix company is one who is:

"called a brother" (that is, one who professes to be a member of the congregation); and practicing fornication, greed, idolotry, reviling (insulting), habitual drunkeness, and/or extortion (theft).

Jehovah's Witnesses do not disfellowship greedy persons. They often do not disfellowship people who regularly get drunk unless their conduct becomes so outrageous and publicly known as to bring reproach upon Jehovah's Witnesses. They do not disfellowship people for many of the things which they themselves class as "idolatry" (for example: materialism, worshipping an organization, etc.). On the other hand, Jehovah's Witnesses do disfellowship and shun people for:

  • no longer claiming to be called a brother/sister.
  • independent study and discussion of the Bible that brings Watchtower doctrine into question.
  • possession of literature written by former members.
  • having lunch with a former member, even if the former member professes to be a Christian and was not disfellowshipped for fornication, greed, idolotry, reviling, drunkeness, or extortion.
  • attending a service of any other church or religious organization.
  • authorizing a blood transfusion, even to save the life of a child.
  • numerous other actions not mentioned in scripture, but deemed by the congregation elders to be "unclean conduct," or "conduct unbecoming" of a Jehovah's Witness. "Conduct" in this case covers a broad range of actions not clearly defined by the Society, leaving discernment about what is not acceptable to the discretion of the congregation's elders. As a result, standards by which people may be disfellowshiped are inconsistent throughout this religion which claims "unity" to be one of their identifying characteristics.
  • "Not to be mixing in company with" . . . "not even eating with . . ."

    Here it is important to learn the customs of association for worship practiced by first-century Jews and Christians, bearing in mind that Jesus and the apostles were Jews. They lived according to the Jewish lifestyle and customs of their day. Jesus taught in the synogogues; hence, he was called "Rabbi." Matt.26:25; 26:49; Mark 9:5; 11:21; 14:25; John 1:38, 49; 3:2, 26; 4:31; 6:25; 9:2; 11:8

    There were two kinds of association for religious worship:
    1) public meetings, such as at the temple and in synogogues, which anyone was allowed to attend; and
    2) private gatherings of the different sects.
    Christians and Jews participated in both. Christians, met in private homes, usually over a special meal with prayer. A presiding minister hosted the meal using either fellowship funds or personal funds. (Acts 20:20; see the footnote in older editions of the NWT)

    Christians were instructed to "greet" one another with a kiss. (Rom.16:16; 1.Cor.16:20; 2Cor.13:12; Ti.3:15; 1Pet.5:14) When Paul sent his "greetings" in a letter to the Christians in Thessalonica, he requested that the "brothers" be greeted by a "holy kiss" on his behalf. (1Thess.5:26)
    It was by this sign that Judas betrayed Jesus. (Luke 22:47,48)

    Clearly, Paul did instruct Christians to expel from the congregation's fellowship any person who was purposely practicing willful sin. The disassociation would quite naturally exclude them from being greeted by the identifying "holy kiss," as well as not being allowed to share in meetings and the meals for Christian worship and prayer. However, Paul's instruction did not prohibit normal conversation or witnessing to former members. Nor were they barred from attending worship in the temple or the synagogues. Jesus, the apostles and Paul, along with the rest of the Jews, worshipped God both publicly in the temple and synagogues, and privately with small groups in various homes. (Acts 5:42) It was from the private Christian fellowship for worship that sinners were excluded.

    What of 2 John 10,11?

    If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, never receive him into your homes or say a greeting to him. For he that says a greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works. -- 2 John 11 (NWT)

    The above scripture is not about people who have been expelled from the Christian congregation. When read in context, it is about anyone who "does not bring this teaching" [of the Christ]. Because they held congregation meetings in their homes (which might be little more than a dug-out or tent outside the city walls of Jerusalem), in their culture their neighbors might view inviting a non-Christian into the home as the Christian sharing worship with non-Christians.

    How did Jesus say one expelled from congregation should be treated?

    Moreover, if your brother commits a sin, go lay bare his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take along with you one or two more, in order that at the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter may be established. If he does not listen to them, speak to the congregation. If he does not listen even to the congregation, let him be to you just as a man of the nations ['Gentile' in some translations] and as a tax collector.--Matt.18:15-17 (NWT)

    Conclusion

    There is no scripture basis for mandating that Christians must totally shun former members (that is, have no communication or conversation with them). The instruction is to expel them from the congregation and treat them like anyone else who is not a member. Especially, there is no scripture to support shunning of one's own relatives--parents, children and siblings.

    If anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his immediate family, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever."-- 1 Tim.5:8 (NIV)

    Even for the rest, Paul counseled against abandoning those separated from the congregation:

    For your part, brothers, do not give up in doing right. But if anyone is not obedient to our word through this letter, keep this one marked, stop associating with him, that he may become ashamed. And yet do not be considering him as an enemy, but continue admonishing him as a brother.-- 2Thes.3:13-15 NWT

    Instruction in the undistributed elders' guide

    When a Jehovah's Witness male qualifies to be an elder in the congregation, he is assigned an uncirculated proprietary book that gives instruction for counseling and disciplinary actions according to the Society's rules. The title of this book is Pay Attention To Yourselves and to All the Flock Interestingly, on the bottom of page 103 in that book, it is stated that Jehovah's Witnesses need not be disfellowshipped for associating with disfellowshipped relatives except if the association involves "spiritual association" or if there is an attempt to excuse the former member's objectional behavior. It says:

    "Normally, a close relative would not be disfellowshipped for associating with a disfellowshipped person unless there is spiritual association or an effort made to excuse the wrongful course."--"Flock book", page 103, last paragraph.

    Despite this documented exclusion, Jehovah's Witnesses the world over are taught that to please Jehovah God they must shun their siblings, their children, and even their parents who either choose to leave or are disfellowshipped -- especially if the crime is variance with Watchtower doctrine for which they are branded "apostates." And it is a fact that many Witnesses have been disfellowshipped for refusing to shun their disfellowshipped relatives.

    The law of love

    If the law of Christianity can be summed up in one word, it is "LOVE." Does not love rescue and recover the sinner? Would Jesus shun the sheep who strayed from the flock?

    Now all the tax collectors and the sinners kept drawing near to him to hear him. Consequently both the Pharisees and the scribes kept muttering saying: "This man welcomes sinners and eats with them." Then he spoke this illustration to them, saying: "What man of you with a hundred sheep, on losing one of them, will not leave the ninety-nine behind in the wilderness and go for the lost one until he finds it? And when he has found it he puts it upon his shoulders and rejoices. And when he gets home he calls his friends and his neighbors together, saying to them, 'Rejoice with me, because I have found my sheep that was lost.' I tell you that thus there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner that repents than over ninety-nine righteous ones who have no need of repentance.-- Luke 15:1-7 (NWT)

    Note that the sheep did not have to come back and find the shepherd, the shepherd went after the lost sheep.

    Let us pray that the Watchtower Society will soon be blessed with "new light" on their policy of extremist shunning of former members, thereby liberating thousands--both within and out of the organization--from the heart-strickening anguish imposed by this cruel, unjust, and unscriptural dogma.


    ***************************                                   ***************************

      

    Watchtower Disfellowshipping and Shunning
    Author Unknown
    (edited)

    The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society and Jehovah's Witnesses use the below stated scriptures as a basis to completely shun a person who has left their organization. No greetings can be exchanged. In many cases, but not all, this includes close family members who do not live in the same household. If they do live in the same household they can speak, yet social activities are discouraged and spiritual discussions are not allowed.

    1 Corinthians Chapter 5

    "Actually fornication is reported among you, and such fornication as is not even among the nations, that a wife a certain man has of his father ... In my letter I wrote you to quit mixing in company with fornicators, not meaning entirely with the fornicator's of this world or the greedy persons and extortion's or idolaters. Otherwise, you would actually have to get out of the world. But now I an writing you to quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reveler or a drunkard or an extortioner, not even eating with such a man. For what do I have to do with judging those outside? Do you not judge those inside, while God judges those outside? Remove the wicked man from among yourselves." (1 Cor 5:1, 9-13)

    In First Corinthians chapter 5 a man was having sexual relations with his fathers wife on a continual basis. It was not a one time event. For this he was to be removed from the congregation. Paul's counsel was for anyone called a brother who was continually practicing fornication, revelry, greediness, drunkenness and extortion was to be removed from the congregation, not even to eat a meal with them. This had absolutely nothing to do with a brother who does not go along with all the teachings of a particular religious organization's policies and rulings. However the Watchtower uses this scripture to excommunicate or disfellowship any member who disagrees and questions any of their teachings.

    I know it is amazing, but brothers have been disfellowshipped for doing cleaning work on an army base, installing alarms and monitoring them for various churches, loading vending machines with tobacco or horoscope notes. One grandmother, who could not go along with the elders counsel to leave the room when her disfellowshipped granddaughter eats with her non witness husband, but instead continued to eat with her and speak to her, was disfellowshipped and as a result, lost association with her entire family. Another 91 year old man, spoke in a private conversation to a friend, expressing disagreement with one of the Watchtower Society's teachings and was also disfellowshipped, resulting in being completely cut off and shunned by the entire congregation and organization, after 70 years of association. He had no help, no love and support shown to him for his remaining years of life. After his death, no one from the congregation attended his funeral. He died a lonely man. These are only a couple cases out of thousands. Search the internet and you will find many, many more, stories of shunning, such as an 85 year old elderly man named Herman Zweigart, who has also been rejected and cut off by the Watchtower policy of shunning.

    2 John

    "For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist. Look out for yourselves, that you do not lose the things we have worked to produce, but that you may obtain a full reward. Everyone that pushes ahead and does not remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God. He that does remain in this teaching is the one that has both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, never receive him into your homes or say a greeting to him. For he that says a greeting (khairo) to him is a sharer in his wicked works." vs 5-11 (New World Translation)

    "The man who is so advanced that he is not content with what Christ taught has in fact no God. The man who bases his life on Christ's teaching (Not a slave class or governing body of men), however, has both the Father and the Son as his God. If any teacher comes to you who is disloyal to what Christ taught (Not the Watchtower Society), don't have him inside your house. Don't even wish him 'Godspeed', unless you want to share in the evil that he is doing. (Phillips Modern Translation)

    In the Second letter of John, counsel is given about the Antichrist. This is said to be all persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. It is then said that Everyone that pushes ahead and does not remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God. And these persons are not to be greeted by Christians or they will be a sharer in his or her wicked works. Notice that this applies to all Antichrists who do not remain in the teaching of the Christ, not the teachings of a "slave class" or particular religious organization. Certainly it would be a misapplication of John's letter, to label a person an antichrist, because of their leaving the WatchTower or any other church and manmade organization, but continue to worship God and his son Jesus Christ. The misapplication of this scripture, helps the Watchtower Society and other organizations to prevent any of their members from communicating with those who have left the religion and thus exposing them to anyone who questions the organizations interpretive teachings.

    Another point is the greeting itself. In contrast to the above scripture in 2 John 2:10,11, there are other scriptures that tell Christians to speak to any persons who leave the Christ, including apostates. Notice in James 5:19,20, Christians are told to "turn a sinner back" "who has been mislead from the truth" and "save his soul for death". In 2 Timothy 2:24-26 Christians are told to help ones to "come back to their proper senses out from the snare of the Devil". And in Titus 1:10-13, It states "It is necessary to shut the mouths of these, as these very men keep on subverting entire households by teaching things they ought not ..." So it is very clear that Christians are instructed to speak to all, including those who turn away from the teachings of Christ.

    The evidence shows that the greeting then, in 2 John 2:10,11 , applies not to a simple "Hello" or "How do you do" , but to an address that implies acceptance and agreement with his cause or teachings , wishing him favor and success. As Phillips Modern Translation shows, it is "wishing this person Godspeed" or for God's approval on his or her actions that go against the teaching of the Christ (Not a slave class or governing body of men). To welcome him in this manner would indeed make one "a sharer in his wicked works." It is evident that any religious organization can use this scripture to prevent their members from obtaining information that might expose the organizational policies as false and with this they wield the weapon of "disfellowshipping" or "excommunicating."

    All Christians are to follow the example of their leader, Jesus Christ and to "follow his steps closely" as a "model". (1 Pet 2:21). And Jesus Christ spoke to the father of apostates, Satan the Devil. (Math 4, Luke 4) He was willing to speak to him, refute him and prove him wrong. Jesus also spoke to the apostate Jewish Pharisees, trying to bring them back to God. After Jesus death in the flesh, being made alive in the spirit, he preached and spoke to the apostate demons. (1 Pet 3:19) Jehovah, as well, also had a conversation with the apostate Satan in heaven over the man Job. (Job 1 & 2) Jehovah also had spoken over and over again with the "apostate nation" of Israel. (Isaiah 10:16) Unlike the Watchtower policy of shunning them, refusing a "Hello", Jehovah repeatedly sent forth prophets. He was "willing to set matters straight." (Isaiah 1:18)

    The Greek Words "Khaire" and "Aspasmos" Are Interchangable

    Apparently when speaking of 1 John 9 & 10 in the Watchtower issues 7/15/85 page 31 and 4/15/88, the Watchtower argues that khaire means to rejoice, a simple greeting, while aspazomai means a more affectionate embrace, enfolding in the arms, kiss, greeting or welcome, and that Apostle John used khaire to go a step further than aspazomai and prevent even a common "good day" to be said. Apparently, the Watchtower overlooks or ignores these two Greek words khaire and aspazomai in the account in Luke 1:28-29. Here the two greek words are obviously used interchangeably.

    "And he came to her and said, "Greetings (khaire), favored one! The Lord is with you." But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting (aspasmos) this might be." - Luke 1:28-29

    Mary applies the term aspasmos to the word khaire pronounced by the angel. She did not do this because the angel had, in the Watchtower definition, "enfolded" her in his arms or kissed her, nor had he at this point engaged in a "long conversation" with her. She refers, not to an embrace or a kiss, but to his "words."

    The Watchtower also fails to recognize that the Greek verb khairein used by John does not relate to some simple greeting such as "Hello." It is not the least bit less "warm" than the other Greek term discussed. To the contrary, the term khairein literally means "to be rejoicing" and corresponds to the Hebrew term shalom, meaning "peace be with you." It was used to express not a mere commonplace greeting, but to express personal or social favor and acceptance, even to express regognition of authority. Recognizing this, some translations, rather than rendering it as simple "greeting", render it as to "welcome."

    Clearly then, what a Christian denies to an antichrist is not some simple salutation such as
    "Hello" or "How do you do," but denies him the address which implies acceptance and agreement with his person or cause, wishing him favor and success. To "welcome" him in this manner would indeed make one "a sharer in his wicked works." To the contrary simply talking to a person does not of itself imply acceptance, agreement or favor, it is what one says that determines this. Certainly one does not become his partner in the evil things he does if one endeavors to refute him or talk him out of his wrong views, convincing him of the error of his ways. Quite the opposite, the Scriptures show this can be a Christian duty. (1)

    Matthew Chapter 18 Verses 15 To 17

    "Moreover, if your brother commits a sin, go lay bare his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you , you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take along with you one or two more, in order that at the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter may be established. If he does not listen even to the congregation, let him be to you just as a man of the nations and as a tax collector."

    Here Jesus instructs his deciples to talk personally one on one to a person who commits a serious sin. If the sinner does not listen then further instruction to bring along two or three witnesses is given. Again, if the sinner does not listen, then the instruction is given to involve the entire congregation, not limiting this only to the elders. And if the sinner still does not listen, then the sinner, is to be treated as a gentile and tax collector.

    How was a gentile and a tax collector treated by Jesus and the first century Christians ? Jesus himself ate meals with them and spoke to them. It was the false religious leaders, the Pharisees who questioned this action. (Matthew 11:19) (Mark 2:15-16) Not only that but it was the tax collector's prayer God heard, not the religious Pharisee, showing that being humble and repentant was more important then following the "lettter of the law. (Luke 18:10-14) Unlike the the Jewish leaders, the Pharisees, who shunned the people of the nations and tax collectors, the common Jews spoke and had dealings with them. And in imitation of Christ, who ate meals and spoke to them, the first century Christians did not shun these persons as well. So to treat a person today as a tax collector and a gentile (person of the nations), one would include being cautious of they way they conduct matters and not let it sway us to perform bad practices, however it would not restrict in any way, the exchanging of greetings, words and conversations. How unlike Jehovah's Witnesses who completely shun anyone who leaves the Watchtower organization, including close relatives and family members.

    2 Thessalonians 3:6, 14

    "Now we are giving your orders, brothers, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, to withdraw from every brother walking disorderly and not according to the tradition you received from us. For you yourselves know the way you ought to imitate us, because we did not behave disorderly among you nor did we eat food from anyone free. To the contrary, by labor and toil night and day we were working so as not to impose an expensive burden upon you."

    "But if anyone is not obedient to our word through this letter, keep this one marked, stop associating with him, that he may become ashamed. And yet do not be considering him as an enemy, but continue admonishing him as a brother."

    The Watchtower Society treats this scripture as a lesser offense, a "marking." But is it? The sin is for "anyone not obedient to our word". This word is the teaching of the Christ. Certainly this is no less an offense then 1 Corinthians Chapter 5 and 2 John. Not only that, but the same Greek phrase (synanamignysthai) for "stop associating" is used in both 2 Thessalonians 3:14 and 1 Corinthians 5:11. There is no difference in the force of the term in both texts. In both cases, Christians are urged to "keep this one marked", to avoid intimate fellowship on a personal level. That is the extent of the counsel, nothing more. This did not include a shunning and refusal to exchange greetings, words and conversations, rather, the Christians were to "stop associating with him" but to "continue admonishing him as a brother." And this applied only to those ones who left the teaching of the Christ, not the teachings of the Watchtower Society or any other religious organization.

    In this context of 2 Thessalonians, to be "walking disorderly" would mean imposing unnecessary "expensive burdens" on the brothers for food and material provisions, while refusing to work for it, for "if anyone does not want ot work , neither let him eat." It also includes "meddling " in other people's affairs that "does not concern them." It had absolutely nothing to do with a person's individual interpretations on the many doctrinal issues outside of the ressurection and faith in Christ. (2 Thessalonians 2:13-17)

    Titus 3:9-10

    "But shun foolish questionings and genealogies and strife and fights over the Law, for they are unprofitable and futile. As for a man that promotes a sect, reject him after a first and a second admonition; knowing that such a man has been turned out of the way and is sinning, he being self-condemned."
     
    Here, in one of the pastoral letters, Titus is instructed to "turn down foolish questionings" and "fights over the law" that exist within the congregation. He is then told to reject those in the congregation who are promoting a sect, but only after admonishing them two times.
    Nowhere is this rejection implied to mean a total shunning of the person.

    What is promoting a sect? Certainly, exercising a degree of Christian "freedom", with the allowance of personal beliefs on the many unclear doctrinal interpretations, would not be promoting a sect. Rather, promoting a sect would be those Christians who were not to "remain in the teaching of the Christ", not the teaching of a particular religious counsel or governing body. Christians would also "maintain their hold on the traditions that were taught" from the inspired writers of the bible and Paul, Silvanus and Timothy, "whether it was through a verbal message or through a letter of ours (theirs)." (Thessalonians 2: 15; 3:6; Galatians 5:1; 2 Cor 3:17; 2 John 9)

    Footnotes: 
    (1) In Search of Christian Freedom - pages 340-341 - Raymond Franz


    ******************************                                 *******************************

    Conditional Friendships Amongst Jehovah's Witnesses
    Author Unknown
    (edited)

    "A true companion is loving all the time, and is a brother that is born for when there is distress" -- Proverbs 17:17.

    Many have felt that "the friends", fellow believers that are Jehovah's Witnesses, are different then the friends in "the world". Many are, and some of the most loving people I have ever known. Others are not, such as a brother and sister who underhandedly solicited all my clients in business. I will always have deep feelings of affection for many of the brothers and sisters. Yet, the fact that they will not even greet or speak to me because I left, not Christ, but the WatchTower organization, has made me truly aware of how fair weather and conditional their friendships really were. There are many fond memories of being out in field service, stopping for coffee and donuts, and many fine conversations in various car groups. Also going to laundromats and door to door, having different people with totally different reactions to the preaching. There were many caring persons but also clicks in the congregation and many I personally found to be persons who were more concerned about meeting the organizational requirements, then showing mercy and loving kindness to each other.

    The value of a good and loyal friend is beyond measure. Yet, in all honesty, most of the friendships in the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses is a conditional friendship. The Watchtower magazine, April 1, 1986 - States - "Approved association with Jehovah's Witnesses requires accepting the entire range of the true teachings of the Bible, including those Scriptural beliefs that are unique to Jehovah's Witnesses. So, in addition to the bible, and the teaching of the Christ, all the creeds of Jehovah's Witnesses are to be accepted in order to be approved for association. Yet these unique teachings change from year to year. They are known as "present truths" resembling a light that zig zags brighter and dimmer like a dimmer switch going up and down. Also, one can observe, many of the "friends" befriend others because of their status or title in the congregation. I have personally seen this on a large scale.

    In Steven Hassan's, book entitled "Combatting Cult Mind Control", on page 122, he speaks of destructive groups, noting on the type of freindships that exist, saying, "A family's love is a much stronger force than the conditional love given by cult members and leaders. A family's love supports one's right to grow into an autonomous adult and make one's own life decisions. A cult's love attempts to keep a person forever as a dependent adolescent -- threatening to be withdrawn if the person makes his own life decisions that differ from the leader's orders."

    One of the greatest part of having true friends, is being able to open up to them. To tell them in private conversation your true feelings, even if it is not accepted by all or what should be according to others. Yet in most cases this does not always hold true in "Jehovah's organization." For no one is allowed to speak openly in a critical way of the group. Even private speech that is critical of the organization, can be considered to be "complaining", "murmuring" and "apostacy." This of course goes even further, for no one is allowed to even speak to a former member of the group and ask him or her why they made their decision to leave the organization. If caught speaking to former members, they too, run the risk of being withdrawn, disfellowshipped.

    I can appreciate the example brought out by brother Ray Franz of the account of Jonathan and King David. Here David was in a sense disfellowshipped. He was placed in a position of complete disfavor with "Jehovah's organization", the nation of Israel. The theocratically appointed King Saul had viewed him as an enemy, "an evil slave". David was forced to live like a disfellowshipped person, even associating and living with Pagans ! Now, how did David's good friend Jonathan treat him ? Did he not remain loving all the time and stick to him during David's time of distress ? If Jonathan had lived according to the Watch Tower concept of an overriding duty to uphold and support all organizational action and policy, he would have stopped associating with him, speaking with him, eating a meal with him, (2 Cor 5:11) and even refusing to exchange a greeting with him, or he would have been a sharer in David's so called wicked works. (David's works were pronounced wicked by King Saul and the Nation of Israel) (2 John 2:10). Instead, Jonathan stuck loyal to David because he believed that David was blessed of Jehovah, despite the organizational rejection he was experiencing. Jonathan's loyalty was not predicated upon, nor controlled by, organizational acceptance and approval. It had a far higher basis.

    A personal experience of mine, was recently I had confided in a close friend, of my changing views of the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses. My friend, I notice suddenly became somewhat frightened and nervous. I called him on the phone about two weeks later and he told me that he spoke to one of the elders and that he looked up in the Watchtower, "what to do if a fellow witness expresses disbelief in the organization". He then proceeded to let me know that he could not associate with me anymore. To quote him "I hope you understand, but the Watchtower says . . . " and over the phone yet !! I can't help of think of the above quoted scripture in Proverbs "A True Companion is loving all the time, and is a brother that is born for when there is distress" - Proverbs 17:17